One of the consequences of the work is to get the money, somehow it is called salary, incentives, commissions, bonuses, or any evidences. And when a type of work we differentiate a work of the "fun" and "not fun", while the amount of money that may be obtained we distinguish in the category "little" or "small" and "many" or "big", then the likelihood of the following four ancha :
Quadrant I: Fun but a small honorarium
Quadrant II: Fun and great rewards
Quadrant III: No fun and benefits small
Quadrant IV: No fun, but big rewards
First, there are the types of jobs, "fun", but only to provide benefits money "little" or "small". Second, there are the types of jobs, "fun", and provide benefits money "many" or "large". Third, there are the types of jobs that "not pleasant", and provide benefits only "small". And last, there is the type of jobs that "not pleasant", but provides benefits money "large".
If the four possibilities that we apply in the work of the main breadwinners us at this time, the first question is: Is it fun working or not? Then, somehow work it fun or not, the question derivation is: Does it provide benefits in the amount of money, large or small?
If the work is fun, but the benefits are small money, there are still reasons to maintain. The same also applies when the job is not fun, but it benefits big money. In the second case this score may be 5:5 alias balanced. To make a difficult decision to leave or maintain the types of jobs there.
Will be the case if other work is fun and benefits are also big money. Reasons to keep the job that became very strong. Indeed have an ideal job there. Fun work will make us productive, and the benefits of productivity will make it feel valued properly. Thus, both our work and the employers will gain the same. There was a win-win relationship in such work.
As if the job that we should do is not very fun and benefits the money is very small. Logically this kind of work should be immediately abandoned. Do something that we do not like the results will not truly productive. On the other hand, because we are not productive then lost the reason for the employers to provide greater benefits (salary increase, for example). Here was lose-lose, both parties only injured.
Quadrant I: Fun but a small honorarium
Quadrant II: Fun and great rewards
Quadrant III: No fun and benefits small
Quadrant IV: No fun, but big rewards
First, there are the types of jobs, "fun", but only to provide benefits money "little" or "small". Second, there are the types of jobs, "fun", and provide benefits money "many" or "large". Third, there are the types of jobs that "not pleasant", and provide benefits only "small". And last, there is the type of jobs that "not pleasant", but provides benefits money "large".
If the four possibilities that we apply in the work of the main breadwinners us at this time, the first question is: Is it fun working or not? Then, somehow work it fun or not, the question derivation is: Does it provide benefits in the amount of money, large or small?
If the work is fun, but the benefits are small money, there are still reasons to maintain. The same also applies when the job is not fun, but it benefits big money. In the second case this score may be 5:5 alias balanced. To make a difficult decision to leave or maintain the types of jobs there.
Will be the case if other work is fun and benefits are also big money. Reasons to keep the job that became very strong. Indeed have an ideal job there. Fun work will make us productive, and the benefits of productivity will make it feel valued properly. Thus, both our work and the employers will gain the same. There was a win-win relationship in such work.
As if the job that we should do is not very fun and benefits the money is very small. Logically this kind of work should be immediately abandoned. Do something that we do not like the results will not truly productive. On the other hand, because we are not productive then lost the reason for the employers to provide greater benefits (salary increase, for example). Here was lose-lose, both parties only injured.
0 komentar
Posting Komentar